2007 Waterford 61cm RS-22 - Reynolds 953 Stainless Steel

By Scooper on 05/03/2007. Bike tags: Road bike | campagnolo | Reynolds 953 stainless steel | Richard Sachs

Click to view other photos

Frame / Size / Year:
2007 61cm Waterford RS-22, Reynolds 953 polished stainless steel, Sachs Newvex stainless lugs

Handlebars / Stem:
Velo-Orange threadless adapter and stem; Nitto B115 42cm alloy bar

Fork / Headset:
Reynolds 531 chromed fork, Campagnolo Record headset

Front Wheel / Hub / Rim / Tire:
700c 32h DT Swiss RR1.1 rims, DT Swiss 240s hub

Rear Wheel / Hub / Rim / Tire:
700c 32h DT Swiss RR 1.1 rims, DT Swiss 240s hub, Campy Record 10-speed sprocket set

Crankset / Bottom Bracket:
Campagnolo Record CT crankset w/172.5mm arms; Campy Record BB

Saddle / Seat Post:
Selle SMP Pro saddle; Thomson Elite alloy seat post

Pedals / Chain:
Shimano SPD pedals; Campagnolo Record chain

Shifters / Derailers:
Campy Record Ergo 10-s shifters, Campy Record front and rear derailleurs

Brakes / Brake Levers:
Campy Record Carbon side-pull brakes, Ergo levers

Gearing / Chainring / Misc.:
13T-29T Campy Record sprocket set, 50T-34T Campy Record chain rings. Record Ergopower Ultra 10 shifters

Notes:

Even with relatively heavy saddle, pedals, and wheels, this bike weighs 20.5 pounds.

People who friended this bike mariner fan, marqueemoon, lowell, yetsuhfrank, jbailie, andreas, Tio, soundsgreen, kilogram, steff, etale, angust69, 62westwallaby, solofe, Jim, sibkis, engo, BenR, muttsbutts, cudak888, Legislator

» login or register to post comments

Nice....! VERY ! nice

Submitted by jbailie on 03/10/2008.

Very nice Stan, Meet me at Crossroads we can do the St. Aug. 112 mile run.......ill bring the Paramount, see ya .....Jim

» login or register to post comments

Thanks, Jim..

Submitted by Scooper on 03/15/2008.

See you in Tempe for the AZ Ironman.
- Stan

» login or register to post comments

Paramount vs Waterford?

Submitted by soundsgreen on 11/23/2007.

So you got to tell me how does your NeoParamount compare to your '72 Paramount? Both are beautiful bikes.

» login or register to post comments

The Waterford accelerates much quicker

Submitted by Scooper on 11/24/2007.

Thanks for the compliment. The ride quality and handling are very similar. That's not surprising since the geometry of both bikes is virtually identical, and both use quality double-butted tube sets. Because it's six pounds lighter, the Waterford is a better climber and accelerates faster. I've adapted quickly to the Waterford's Campy Ergo shifters, and really like the precise gear shifting. I'm toying with the idea of getting lighter wheels, saddle, and a carbon fork just to see what effect a three or four pound weight loss would have on climbing.
- Stan

» login or register to post comments

incredible looking frame

Submitted by misterc on 10/01/2007.

but in these photos it looks set up wrong, the open pros look bland, no style, sorry. Brooks also looks odd with all the new school campy carbon, and whats up with those pedals. Are you just cruzing this thing down to the coffee shop? Anyways this setup is beautiful...

» login or register to post comments

Thanks for the comments. I

Submitted by Scooper on 10/05/2007.

Thanks for the comments. I like building my own wheels, and have had good luck with the 36h 3-cross laced Open Pros. Stylish they ain't, but neither am I. :-)

I love Brooks saddles, and haven't found any I like better for longer rides (not that I haven't tried lots of others).

The rattrap platform pedals are what I use on city streets, and they get switched out for SPD-SL clipless when I'm on longer rides in the country (Marin, east bay, peninsula). I try to do at least one 100 mile day ride a month, which gets this 65 year old codger some exercise.

- Stan

» login or register to post comments